According to Daniel Hwang, whose company Stakefish runs a validator for Juno, members of the Juno community are trying to figure out who would have been motivated to execute the attack for no obvious financial gain. According to Hwang, token holders are pointing fingers at potential culprits ranging from competitor blockchains to bagholders on the losing end of last month’s governance vote.
Related posts
-
Bittensor’s TAO Slides 15% After $8M Wallet Attack
Meanwhile, independent security researcher @ZachXBT said on his Telegram channel that one user was drained of... -
Token Launchpad Pump.Fun Overtakes Ethereum Blockchain With $2M in Daily Revenue to Take No. 1 Position
Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal... -
RedStone, Blockchain Oracle Project Pushing Into Restaking, Raises $15M
The fresh round of capital will go towards hiring new team members, according to a press...