Over the years, several cryptocurrency companies have claimed that deposits with them were insured by the United States Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as if they were regular savings accounts. While so far, no crypto firm has been able to offer depositors this type of insurance, some speculate it could be the key to mass adoption.
The most notable case is that of bankrupt lender Voyager Digital, which saw regulators instruct it to remove โfalse and misleading statementsโ regarding FDIC insurance. Crypto exchange FTX has been a beacon of hope looking to backstop contagion in the cryptocurrency industry, but it received a cease-and-desist letter from the FDIC to stop suggesting user funds on the platform were insured.
As it stands, even major players in the cryptocurrency space arenโt FDIC-insured. Coinbase, for example, details on its pages that it carries insurance against losses from theft but is not an FDIC-insured bank and that cryptocurrency is โnot insured or guaranteed by or subject to the protectionsโ of the FDIC or Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC).
The exchange, however, points out that โto the extent U.S. customer funds are held as cash, they are maintained in pooled custodial accounts at one or more banks insured by the FDIC.โ Speaking to Cointelegraph on the subject, a Coinbase spokesperson only said she can confirm โthat Coinbase is aligned with the latest FDIC guidance.โ
So what is FDIC insurance, why is it so sought-after in the cryptocurrency industry and why does it remain so elusive?
What is FDIC insurance?
The FDIC itself was created amid the Great Depression in 1933 to boost the financial systemโs stability following a wave of bank failures during the 1920s and has managed to protect depositors ever since.
FDIC insurance refers to the insurance provided by this agency that safeguards customer deposits in the event of bank failures. Cal Evans, managing associate at blockchain legal services firm Gresham International, told Cointelegraph:
โFDIC insurance is basically a layer of protection that covers one individual for up to $250,000 and its a backing thatโs given by the United States government. It says โlook, if this company goes bankrupt, we will guarantee your account to the value of $250,000 per person, per company.โโ
So, if an FDIC-insured financial institution fails to meet its obligations to customers, the FDIC pays these amounts to depositors up to the assured amount while assuming the bank and selling its assets to pay off owed debt. It is worth noting that FDIC insurance does not cover investments like mutual funds.
Other countries have similar schemes, with deposits in the European Union being guaranteed up to $98,000 (100,000 euros) to protect against bank failures, for example. These schemes improve confidence in the financial system.
Speaking to Cointelegraph, Noah Buxton, a partner and practice leader for blockchain and digital assets at consulting firm Armanino, said, โNo customerโs crypto holdings are FDIC-insured today,โ but added that crypto platforms often hold customersโ dollar balances in financial institutions that are FDIC-insured.
There is a distinct difference between users having their funds insured, and the impact of a cryptocurrency firm having FDIC insurance โ even for only United States dollar deposits โ is hard to estimate.
The potential impact on crypto
If the FDIC were to insure deposits at a cryptocurrency platform, it would likely gain an advantage over other U.S.-based cryptocurrency platforms, as the perceived security of that platform would gain a huge boost, especially as it would be seen as a green flag from regulators as well.
Recent:ย Techโs good intentions and why Satoshiโs new โsocial orderโ foundered
Evans said that the FDIC would give the retail market โa lot more confidence because if FDIC insurance does happen and does apply to these companies, that means itโs going to massively, massively encourage people who are in the United States to put their money in crypto because itโs as secure as putting dollars at a bank,โ adding:
โItโs going to massively help adoption, because itโs going to encourage the retail market to see companies like this at a parallel, in term of safety, with banks that people know.โ
Mila Wild, marketing manager at cryptocurrency exchange ChangeHero, told Cointelegraph that one of the biggest problems the cryptocurrency sector faces is a lack of regulation and supervision, especially after the collapse of the Terra ecosystem โundermined the confidence of many investors.โ
Per Wild, the FDIC doesnโt just insure customer deposits, as it also โconducts constant monitoring of financial institutions for security and compliance with consumer protection requirements.โ
Dion Guillaume, global head of PR and communication at crypto exchange Gate.io, told Cointelegraph that a โfriendly crypto regulatory environment would be critical for adoption,โ as โblind regulatory sanctionsโ do not help. Guillaume added that insuring digital assets can be very different and several factors need to be carefully considered.
How hard is it to get FDIC insured?
As the FDIC could significantly boost confidence in the industry and several large exchanges have shown interest in getting it, itโs important to look at how hard it is for a cryptocurrency-native firm to actually become FDIC-insured.
Evans told Cointelegraph that itโs โactually relatively straightforward to getโ as long as specific criteria are met by the organization looking to get it. The organization needs to make necessary applications and prove requisite liquidity and could potentially have to detail its management structure.
To Evans, FDIC insurance would โmassively give companies operating in the United States a huge, huge benefit over foreign firms,โ as U.S. residents who open accounts with insured firms would have a major incentive not to use decentralized exchanges or other peer-to-peer platforms.
Wild had a more negative stance, saying itโs โnot possible to get FDIC insurance,โ as it only covers โdeposits held in insured banks and savings associations and protects against losses caused by the bankruptcy of these insured deposit institutions.โ Wild added:
โEven if we imagine that crypto projects will be able to have FDIC insurance someday, it means sacrificing decentralization as one of the core crypto values.โ
She further claimed that the FDICโs statements on dealings with crypto firms are โtrying to infringe on crypto companies and emphasize their perceived negative impact on society.โ Wild concluded that the FDIC telling crypto projects not to suggest theyโre insured โcould further lowerโ trust in cryptocurrencies.
To Wild, cryptocurrencies will remain a riskier asset for the time being, as users wonโt have any type of government protection. As a result, crypto users should โstay vigilant about their assets.โ This does not mean fiat savings are safer, she said, as increasing inflation is eating those away.
Noah Buxton, a partner at consulting firm Armanino, went into more detail on the process, telling Cointelegraph that platforms attaining FDIC insurance would โrequire a modified underwriting regime, the creation of which has many significant hurdles.โ
He said the FDIC would need to figure out how to take possession of crypto assets, how to value them and how to distribute them to the customers of failed crypto platforms, adding:
โWhile this is possible and may happen, we are more likely to see private insurance and reinsurance vehicles fill the void for the foreseeable future. This is a necessary component of any market and the broader coverage availability and competitive set of insurance options will benefit crypto holders.โ
Is the insurance worth chasing?
If users are, in the future, able to get insurance through other sources โ such as private company solutions or decentralized protocols โ itโs worth questioning whether FDIC insurance is worth it in the long run. Insurance from the FDIC could be a significant centralizing factor, as most would likely move to a platform that has its backing.
Evans said he believes FDIC insurance โis not necessarily wanted or needed,โ as wherever thereโs more protection, โthere happens to be more oversight and regulation,โ which would mean insured companies would be โvery secure and very regulated.โ
These regulations could further restrict those who are able to create accounts with these companies, which would add to the question of centralization that the crypto insurance industry already faces.
Bitcoin Foundation chairman Brock Pierce told Cointelegraph that the crypto industry will nevertheless โsee more companies try to get itโ after the recent wave of crypto lenders going under, which will make it โeven harder for them now.โ
Pierce did not expect FDIC insurance to โbe a big deal or matter much with regards to overall crypto adoption.โ Whether it impacts cryptocurrency adoption at all may only be clear once/if the FDIC does insure cryptocurrency deposits.
Recent:ย โThe social benefits are hugeโ: Web3 gaming to shift digital ownership
Itโs worth noting that FDIC insurance may bring in a false sense of security. While no bank depositor has lost their funds since the FDIC was launched, its reserve fund isnโt fully funded. The FDIC, according to Investopedia, is โnormally short of its total insurance exposure by more than 99%.โ
The FDIC has, at times, borrowed money from the U.S. Treasury in the form of short-term loans. Self-custody may, for the experienced cryptocurrency investor, continue being a viable option, even if a crypto firm is one day FDIC insured.
