Ethereum staking services agree to 22% limit of all validators

At least five Ethereum liquid staking providers have either imposed or are working to impose a self-limit rule in which they promise not to own more than 22% of the Ethereum staking market โ€” seen as a move to ensure the Ethereum network remains decentralized.

Among the Ethereum staking providers either already committed or are working to commit to the self-limit rule include Rocket Pool,ย StakeWise, Stader Labs and Diva Staking,ย according to Ethereum core developer Superphiz.

Puffer Finance, another liquid staking service, also announced its commitment to the self-limit.ย 

The proposal presumably aims to address concerns of Ethereum staking becoming increasingly centralized.

As to why the self-limit was proposed at 22%, Superphiz explained that because 66% of validators need to agree on the state of Ethereum, setting the limit below 22% means at least four major entities must collude in order for the chain to reach finalization.

Finality is the point where transactions on a blockchain are considered immutable, supposedly ensuring that transactions within a block cannot be altered.

The idea was proposed by Superphiz in May 2022 when he questioned whether a staking pool would be willing to put the health of the chain before its own profits.

Interestingly, the largest Ethereum liquid staking provider, Lido Finance, voted by a 99.81% majority not to self-limit back in June.

โ€œThey have expressed an intention to control the majority of validators on the beacon chain,โ€ Superphiz said in an Aug. 31 post.

Votes casted from Lido (LDO) token holders on the self-limiting proposal. Source: Snapshot

Lido currently dominates the Ethereum staking market, accounting 32.4% of all staked Ether, while the next entity, Coinbase, accounts for only 8.7% of the market, according to data from Dune Analytics.

Ethereum stakers by staking amount and market share, showing that Lido is the only one above the 22% threshold. Source: Dune Analytics

Whoโ€™s in the right? Mixed reactions from the Ethereum community

One industry pundit, โ€œMippo,โ€ explained on Aug. 31 that the self-limit proposal has nothing to do with โ€œEthereum alignmentโ€ โ€” a principle understood to enable credible neutrality and permissionless innovation on Ethereum.

Mippo claimed those trying to push the proposal wouldnโ€™t make way if they were in Lidoโ€™s position.

Related: Ethereum is about to get crushed by liquid staking tokens

โ€œEveryone is doing the economically selfish and rational thing here,โ€ Mippo concluded.

โ€œFolks in the ETH community should not shame more user-friendly solutions as greedy products,โ€ said another observer.

However, others were more wary of the potential centralization issues at hand, describing Lidoโ€™s market share dominance as โ€œdisgusting and selfish.โ€

Magazine: DeFi Dad, Hall of Flame: Ethereum is โ€˜woefully undervaluedโ€™ but growing more powerful