“Due to the Protocol’s decentralized nature, the identities of the Scam Token issuers are basically unknown and unknowable, leaving Plaintiffs with an identifiable injury but no identifiable defendant,” the judge wrote. “Undaunted, they now sue the Uniswap Defendants and the VC Defendants, hoping that this Court might overlook the fact that the current state of cryptocurrency regulation leaves them without recourse, at least as to the specific claims alleged in this suit.”
Related posts
-
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) Approved Listing Its First Bitcoin ETF
Vaneck, a global investment firm, has announced the launch of the Vaneck Bitcoin ETF (VBTC), the... -
Japanese Regulator Issues Warning to Unregistered Crypto Platform Lbank Exchange
The Financial Services Agency (FSA) of Japan issued a warning to Lbank Exchange, an overseas cryptocurrency... -
New York Attorney General Reaches $50,000,000 Settlement With Crypto Exchange Gemini Over Fraud Allegations
New York Attorney General Letitia James is settling with crypto exchange Gemini over fraud allegations for...