The first half of Friday’s testimony was basically “A History of FTX, presented by Samuel Bankman-Fried.” For those following the case over the past year, nothing new. For those of us who have been tracking FTX since its founding, maybe a bit of useful detail but basically really nothing new. But we’re not the intended audience – the jury is. One audience member in the overflow room, who said she did not have much familiarity with FTX or Bankman-Fried, said she found it useful. And I overheard a few people at the end of the day Friday say they found Bankman-Fried’s version of events plausible.
Related posts
-
When Icons Fall: P. Diddy, Sam Bankman-Fried, and the Lure of High-Profile Cases for Attorneys
When Icons Fall: P. Diddy, Sam Bankman-Fried, and the Lure of High-Profile Cases for Attorneys Source... -
FTX’s Downfall Couldn’t Have Happened Without SBF’s Fraud – Or Prager Metis’ Audit Failure
Auditing standards require at a minimum that auditors understand the entity and its environment, that it... -
Bitwise CIO Highlights Bitcoin’s Role as a Hedge Against U.S. Public Debt
Matt Hougan, CIO of Bitwise, one of the world’s largest crypto fund managers, referred to the...