Binance and Zhao, more commonly known as “CZ,” filed a reply to the SEC, alongside Binance.US, which submitted its own separate, but similar, filing arguing that the SEC did not show that the exchanges’ U.S. customers had any contracts that would meet the definition of an “investment contract,” or that other elements of the Supreme Court case were met.
Related posts
-
Bollinger Bands Indicate XRP Price Surge Ahead Despite SEC Challenges: Expert
Ronaldo is an experienced crypto enthusiast dedicated to the nascent and ever-evolving industry. With over five... -
XRP Macro Charts Signal Explosive Bull Surge Amid SEC Appeal
Este artículo también está disponible en español. In a technical analysis shared with his followers on... -
Ethereum Solo Staking Made Easier? Vitalik Buterin Supports Lower Entry Requirements
Este artículo también está disponible en español. Ethereum (ETH) co-founder Vitalik Buterin advocates reducing the ETH...