Binance and Zhao, more commonly known as “CZ,” filed a reply to the SEC, alongside Binance.US, which submitted its own separate, but similar, filing arguing that the SEC did not show that the exchanges’ U.S. customers had any contracts that would meet the definition of an “investment contract,” or that other elements of the Supreme Court case were met.
Related posts
-
SEC Reports Record $8.2B in Remedies With 583 Enforcement Actions in 2024
The SEC’s record-breaking enforcement year revealed unprecedented financial penalties... -
Pro-Crypto Shift at SEC Begins as Anti-Crypto Commissioner Steps Down After Gensler Resigns
The SEC’s anti-crypto grip falters as Commissioner Lizárraga and... -
Robinhood’s Dan Gallagher declines potential SEC chair role
Dan Gallagher, Robinhood Markets’ chief legal officer, has withdrawn from consideration to lead the U.S. Securities...