Because the scenario outlined in this case is narrow and unusual, it “will have limited applicability in arbitration-related jurisprudence going forward,” said Richard Silberberg, an arbitration lawyer with Dorsey & Whitney and a director of the New York International Arbitration Center. “The unanimous SCOTUS decision that a court, not an arbitrator, must decide whether the parties’ first agreement was superseded by the second was hardly surprising,” he added, because previous rulings had pointed in that direction.
Related posts
-
U.S. Crypto Industry Will Follow a Different Path From Rest of World: BitMEX Group CEO
SINGAPORE —The U.S. crypto market will take a different path from the rest of the world,... -
Bitcoin ETFs record nearly $500m inflows over five days, Ether ETFs continue positive streak
Spot Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S. marked their fifth straight day of net inflows, with spot... -
Singapore Court Grants WazirX Four-Month Conditional Moratorium: Source
The conditions imposed on WazirX include revealing the addresses of its Wallets through a court affidavit,...