Had it been implemented as proposed, the rule would have required the sender of any transaction between unhosted wallets to collect know-your-customer data from the receiver. A similar proposal in the U.S. received backlash due to concerns about whether it would even be possible for some entities, like smart contracts with their own wallets, to comply, as well as whether the data would be safe if any random individual had to store it.
Related posts
-
Bittensor’s TAO Slides 15% After $8M Wallet Attack
Meanwhile, independent security researcher @ZachXBT said on his Telegram channel that one user was drained of... -
Bitcoin price growth lagged crypto mining stocks following halving, data shows
Despite Bitcoin’s strong start in early 2024, crypto mining stocks outperformed BTC after the halving, with... -
Northern Data Mulls US Market AI Entity IPO at up to $16 Billion Valuation
Northern Data, a European cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI),...