One idea: A regulated financial institution could confirm with mathematical proof that the holder of an address sending or receiving cryptocurrency had at some point been verified by a trusted source for KYC purposes without needing to know the address holder’s name or other identifying information. The proof would be required only at the on- and off-ramps between on-chain crypto world and the financial system – i.e., when a cryptocurrency is being exchanged for fiat currency – to keep on-chain crypto transactions frictionless. Meanwhile, we could have system-wide, on-chain data analyses to meet AML needs, identifying nodes engaged in patterns of illicit activity, all without invasive identity requirements.
Related posts
-
Merlin: Leading Consumer-Focused Innovation and Meme-Driven Culture in the Bitcoin Ecosystem
PRESS RELEASE. Merlin has emerged as a pioneer in the Bitcoin ecosystem, driven by a consumer-focused... -
HTX DAO Drives Innovation in Exchange Ecosystem With Proposals on “Multiple Farming” and Liquidity Burning
PRESS RELEASE. In the competitive cryptocurrency market, innovation has emerged as a critical driver for the... -
How Crypto Is Changing Online Gambling and Betospin Leads the Way
As online gambling is evolving, cryptocurrencies have come into...