“The court declines to find as a matter of law that a reasonable investor would have derived any expectation of profit from general cryptocurrency market trends, as opposed to Ripple’s efforts to facilitate XRP’s use in cross-border payments, among other things,” Hamilton wrote. “Accordingly, the [court] cannot find as a matter of law that Ripple’s conduct would not have led a reasonable investor to have an expectation of profit due to the efforts of others.”
Related posts
-
Ripple Vs. SEC Battle Far From Over As Regulator Opposes Court’s Decision
Este artículo también está disponible en español. The lawsuit between Ripple and the United States Securities... -
Bitcoin Breaks $66,000, But Analyst Warns Against Fresh Longs—Here’s Why
Bitcoin has shown bullish momentum during the past day, but an analyst has pointed out how... -
Bitcoin Breaks $65K, $365M In Spot ETF Inflows Fueling The Rally
Este artículo también está disponible en español. Bitcoin has been the subject of recent media attention,...