First, and perhaps foremost, the Fed would be conflicted. As an alternative payment service, stablecoins compete with the Fed’s own payment infrastructure, including FedNow, the central bank’s instant payment service. The Fed’s consideration of a central bank digital currency would leave it further conflicted when regulating privately issued stablecoins, as those two digital representations of the dollar can be seen as substitutes. Any government body, the Fed included, would struggle to objectively analyze private payment innovations that compete with its own services. Giving the Fed the authority to regulate stablecoins unfairly stacks the deck against payment alternatives. Simply put, the fox shouldn’t be allowed to guard the henhouse.
Related posts
-
Tokenized Treasuries Like Blackrock’s (BLK) BUIDL Will Challenge Stablecoins But Won’t Fully Replace Them, JPMorgan (JPM) Said
The report also said the amount of “idle cash” within stablecoins is hard to calculate, but... -
Stablecoins Could Be a $5-$10 Trillion Market, Will Be Integral Part of the Global Financial System
Stablecoins are one of the most popular innovations in crypto, bridging government-issued fiat currencies on traditional... -
El Dorado CEO: Venezuela Highlights Stablecoins’ Use Case as a ‘Tool for Resilience’
Guillermo Goncalvez, founder and CEO of El Dorado, a...