Meanwhile, some Anchor users criticized the development on the proposal’s official discussion forum. “Anchor’s competitive advantage is a STABLE deposit rate. If we switch to a dynamic rate we’re giving up on that advantage,” pseudonymous user ‘fulltimecrypto’ wrote. Other users were more upbeat. “We’re big enough now. It’s time to mature a bit and realize 20% on stables is excessive,” said ‘DefiantProtocol.’ “Cutting the rate in half wouldn’t lead to a significant flight of capital.”
Related posts
-
Bitcoin Hashrate Falls Off, Miners Expecting Pause In Bull Run?
On-chain data shows the Bitcoin Hashrate has seen a setback recently, a potential indication that miners... -
ATH Predictions Backed By Solid Google Search Interest
Este artículo también está disponible en español. Recently, XRP has gained immense attention in the cryptocurrency... -
Thala protocol resumes operations after $25.5m exploit
Decentralized finance firm Thala has restarted operations a day after the protocol’s liquidity pools were exploited...