Similar to last year, there are two common threads in our methodology. First, in keeping with our goal of rigor, defensibility and reproducibility, we used externally verified, quantitative data (e.g., Web of Science) whenever such data was available and normalized this data where appropriate to add as much nuance into our rankings as possible. When we required qualitative data, we sent out open, public, shareable surveys through all available channels and did our best not to limit participation in any way, constructive or otherwise.
Related posts
-
Understanding Payment Structures in Taiko’s Self-Sustaining Blockchain Network
In order for a network to be self-sustaining, there need to... -
Tezos X: Unveiling the Future of Modular Blockchain Design
The next generation of blockchain technology has arrived with the introduction... -
Nigerian Blockchain Committee Warns Of Impact
The ongoing legal battle between Nigerian authorities and the crypto exchange Binance has significantly affected the...