Based on the responses from Armstrong and other crypto executives and decision-makers regarding regulations, it is clear many of them do not seem to understand that they are providing regulated services in a non-compliant manner. In the specific case to which Armstrong reacted before the facts were in, the SEC charged Kraken because it was paying interest on deposit accounts. That is a regulated activity that the SEC provides certain exemptions for, e.g., banks don’t have to register with the commission to pay interest on a savings account; it is certainly not the case that crypto companies are exempted from registering for paying interest to depositors just because the deposits are in crypto, as Brian Armstrong seems to assume.
Related posts
-
Over $225,000,000 in Crypto Distributed To Hack Victims of Collapsed Exchange Cryptopia After Years of Waiting
Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of crypto assets are being distributed to hack victims of... -
From Oilfields to Crypto Fields: Halliburton Invests in Bitcoin Mining Startup
Halliburton, the world’s second-biggest oilfield services firm, has taken a step into the bitcoin (BTC) mining... -
Toncoin and Solana eye new all-time highs as crypto whales rush to buy Lightchain AI
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page...