Crypto industry braces for impact with Silvergate exit

The closure of Silvergate Bank is not a systematic risk for the United States banking system but could have a significant impact on the crypto markets, multiple sources told Cointelegraph. The consequences may include increasing banking concentration among a few partners and presenting challenges for venture capital firms seeking to establish banking relationships in the country.

Silvergate had been a crypto-fiat gateway network for financial institutions and a significant on-ramp for cryptocurrencies in the United States, but on March 8, its parent company, Silvergate Capital Corporation, disclosed its plans to โ€œvoluntarily liquidateโ€ assets and shut down operations.

The move affects a โ€œhuge number of market markers and exchangesโ€ that relied on the bank to process instant crypto-fiat transactions, explained Mark Lurie, co-founder and CEO of Shipyard Software, a decentralized development company. He said that as Silvergate winds down operations, risk concentration in the industry will also increase, with few banks still partnering with crypto firms.

โ€œWhen I got into Bitcoin back in 2011, I never would have thought that an FDIC-insured bank involved in the industry would actually fail. This is certainly a setback, and there will be implications that will reverberate across the digital asset industry for some time. I suspect that it will be difficult for a while for crypto ventures to acquire banking relationships in the United States given the regulatory measures of late,โ€ crypto mainstay Charlie Shrem told Cointelegraph.

Related:ย Geminiโ€™s banking relationship with JPMorgan โ€˜remains intactโ€™

Crypto exchange FTXโ€™s collapse led to extensive liquidity problems at Silvergate, although the bank had already been affected earlier in 2022 by the downturn in crypto markets. Outflows in 2022โ€™s fourth quarter resulted in a $1 billion net loss attributable to common shareholders. In the previous quarter, the transfer volume on the Silvergate Exchange Networkย was $112.6 billion, a $50 billion plummet compared with Q3 2021.

โ€œThe bank had attracted a lot of crypto deposits, and as knock-on effects of FTX contagion started to catch up, the banks faced substantial depositsโ€™ outflow. This forced them to sell off bonds, resulting in material losses as interest rates increased recently,โ€ explained a spokesperson from Finery Markets, adding that:

โ€œA downward spiral ensued with rapidly worsening capital adequacy ratios, which led to more clients withdrawing funds. […] This could potentially mean a certain trend towards crypto moving outside the U.S., at least until a more comprehensive regulatory framework is established.โ€

According to Lurie, the bank run on Silvergate was different from previous failures within the space. โ€œUnlike Luna and FTX, which tried to spin their collapse as a bank run when they were actually insolvent, the Silvergate situation seems like a genuine bank run. […] This is the distinction between a bank run and a fraud,โ€ he said.ย 

Some believe United States authorities are discouraging banks from offering services to the crypto industry, Cointelegraph reported. The alleged strategy consists of using โ€œmultiple agencies to inhibit banks from dealing with crypto firms,โ€ leading crypto businesses to become โ€œcompletely unbanked.โ€

As banks sever relationships with crypto companies, Binanceย announced in February a temporary suspension of bank transfers of U.S. dollars. Just a few weeks before, in January, the crypto exchange said its SWIFT transfer partner, Signature Bank,ย would only process trades by users with U.S. dollar bank accounts over $100,000.

Recent regulatory developments were among the reasons mentioned by Silvergate to end its crypto banking business. U.S. authoritiesโ€™ crackdown on the industry, however, may increase the number and quality of banking relationships with the industry over time, according to Shrem:

โ€œLooking ahead, I canโ€™t help but be optimistic. This industry has grown leaps and bounds, especially for being as young as it is, and Iโ€™m still confident that we are in the process of building a better, more equitable financial system in the United States and globally.โ€