While the crypto industry has not tried to defend against the actual allegations – that the DAO, alongside its predecessor company, bZeroX, offered unregistered products to U.S. customers – it has collectively expressed concern about how the CFTC has gone about trying to bring a case against the DAO. Specifically, lawyers are concerned that the CFTC has painted a broad brush by trying to hold each voting token holder individually liable, as well as by trying to serve the entire DAO by posting the lawsuit in a web portal and on a forum.
Related posts
-
Latam Insights: El Salvador’s IMF Bitcoin-Braking Deal and Argentina’s Cyberspace Crypto Patrol
Welcome to Latam Insights, a compendium of the most relevant crypto and economic news from Latin... -
Binance Founder CZ Warns: Receiving Crypto This Way Could Instantly Empty Your Wallet
Crypto owners risk losing everything by accepting assets via... -
‘$600M Would Buy a Lot of Bitcoin’: Microstrategy Boss Steers Bezos Wedding Drama Toward Crypto
Michael Saylor, co-founder and executive chairman of Microstrategy, brought bitcoin into the spotlight during an online...