“The Court should preclude irrelevant, confusing, and prejudicial questioning, evidence, and arguments about the involvement of attorneys” if no further details are provided, U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said in the filing, arguing Bankman-Fried should specify the legal advice or abandon his proposed defense.
Related posts
-
Prosecutors Tell NY Court They Didn’t Renege on FTX Exec Ryan Salame’s Plea Deal
In their memo, prosecutors called Salame’s assertions “inaccurate, incomplete, and outright false” and denied that they... -
DOJ Penalizes Robinhood $3.9 Million For Past Crypto Withdrawal Restrictions
Ronaldo is an experienced crypto enthusiast dedicated to the nascent and ever-evolving industry. With over five... -
SEC Might Challenge FTX Bankruptcy Estate From Paying Back Customers With Stablecoins
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may have thrown a spanner in the wheels of...