The lawyers argued that this would “require relief from this Court,” they would be faced with a separate risk of commingling of their treasury investments, and the step “creates a risk of loss in the event of a need for rapid monetization, or the lack of liquidity in the surety collateral market, which is not an idle concern given the recent bank failures allegedly caused in part by overinvestment in U.S. treasuries.”
Related posts
-
Will It Recover Or Hit Rock Bottom?
Polkadot (DOT), a prominent player in the blockchain ecosystem, is currently experiencing a dramatic decline, prompting... -
Global ETF market could hit $35 trillion by 2035
The global Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) market could witness some remarkable growth over the next decade. Assets... -
Optimism Activates Fault-Proofs On Mainnet, OP Is Down 55% In 3 Months
In a major milestone for Ethereum and layer-2s, Optimism, a layer-2 scaling platform for the second...