“A key bZeroX objective in transferring control of the bZx Protocol (now the Ooki Protocol) to the bZx DAO (now the Ooki DAO) was to attempt to render the bZx DAO, by its decentralized nature, enforcement-proof. Put simply, the bZx Founders believed they had identified a way to violate the Act and Regulations, as well as other laws, without consequence … The bZx Founders were wrong, however. DAOs are not immune from enforcement and may not violate the law with impunity,” the complaint said.
Related posts
-
U.S. SEC Loses Crypto Lawsuit Over ‘Dealer’ Definition That Pushed Into Crypto
Gensler’s departure press release on Thursday referenced the agency’s clashes with crypto, noting, “Court after court... -
Dogecoin Drama Ends: Investors Drop Elon Musk Lawsuit Appeal
A lawsuit claiming that Tesla’s Elon Musk rigged Dogecoin to benefit his company has ended. According... -
Crypto Vs. Gensler: 18 States File Lawsuit Against SEC Over Alleged Industry Persecution
For months, the cryptocurrency community has criticized the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Chairman,...