As bad as she was, the Googler was worse. Gaddis, who responds to legal requests the search engine giant receives, spent his ever-so-brief testimony saying there existed metadata that (I guess) demonstrated some Google doc whose contents weren’t actually discussed had been received, or worked on, or something, by Bankman-Fried. (Editor’s note: No, I’m not going to try to improve that sentence because it’s perfect.) Then cross-examination demonstrated Gaddis didn’t know a damn thing about metadata, a revelation that threw the bench into disarray.
Related posts
-
SEC’s Case Against Binance Moves Forward With Major Allegations Intact
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia... -
U.S. Judge Lets Most of SEC Case Against Binance Proceed, Dismisses Secondary Sales Charge
In a late Friday order, Judge Amy Berman Jackson, of the District Court for the District... -
Who Draws the Lines? The Case for Decentralized Map Making
From there, users can layer on additional data for navigation, points-of-interest, business needs, etc. Through a...