“Did you have a view that Alameda could borrow, so long as borrows weren’t in excess of assets?” Cohen asked Singh, clearly hoping for some variation of a “yes” answer. Singh, however, seemed to sense a trap. He answered obliquely: there were many “scenarios” where Singh didn’t think Alameda’s borrows were “appropriate,” he told Cohen. The lawyer let out an audible “sigh,” looked down and spent the next several moments leafing through the pile of papers on his podium. While we’re finally starting to see glimmers of Bankman-Fried’s defense strategy, his lawyers still face an uphill battle.
Related posts
-
Australian Court Exempts Block Earner from Paying Penalty; Criticizes Regulator’s Misleading Press Release
A Federal court in Australia has relieved the crypto... -
WIF Starts New Rally Above 100-Day Moving Average, What Next?
The recent upward movement has led the price of WIF to continue its rally above the... -
Ripio CEO: Brazilian Companies Are Paying Chinese Suppliers With Cryptocurrency
Sebastian Serrano, CEO of Ripio, one of the largest...