The introduction of the Libra stablecoin project led to, years later, multiple regulatory approaches and the certainty that sooner or later, governments will have rules in place for how stablecoins can operate. However, all of these efforts have focused on asset-backed stablecoins, not algorithmic stablecoins. The novel structures here might result in new approaches from regulators. The major difference? Libra never launched, and there haven’t been any asset-backed stablecoin collapses the way there was with UST. That difference may lead to regulators placing a higher priority on this issue.
Related posts
-
Most U.S. Voters Cringe About Crypto, But Enough Care to Warrant Politicians’ Attention
About 14% of people in the online survey of registered voters own crypto right now, they... -
Solana price rises 12% as new SOL presale attracts investor attention
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page... -
Philadelphia’s Republic First Bank Closed by Regulators, Assets Assumed by Fulton Bank
In the wake of a turbulent period for U.S....