Binance and Zhao, more commonly known as “CZ,” filed a reply to the SEC, alongside Binance.US, which submitted its own separate, but similar, filing arguing that the SEC did not show that the exchanges’ U.S. customers had any contracts that would meet the definition of an “investment contract,” or that other elements of the Supreme Court case were met.
Related posts
-
Binance launches BNSOL Super Staking with MANTRA rewards
Binance’s BNSOL Super Staking program introduces MANTRA, offering enhanced staking returns while maintaining the liquidity of... -
Report: Binance Thwarted Scams to the Tune of $129M in 2024
The report was published by the exchange to highlight... -
Binance endorses Thai ex-PM’s proposal for a pilot Bitcoin project
The chief executive of Binance’s Thai arm has encouraged the Bank of Thailand to consider former...