Binance and Zhao, more commonly known as “CZ,” filed a reply to the SEC, alongside Binance.US, which submitted its own separate, but similar, filing arguing that the SEC did not show that the exchanges’ U.S. customers had any contracts that would meet the definition of an “investment contract,” or that other elements of the Supreme Court case were met.
Related posts
-
Here’s How Quickly Gary Gensler Could Lose His SEC Chair Gig Under Trump
Gensler has been on the forefront of those actions, being openly skeptical of cryptocurrencies. Just last... -
Multipli Triumphs at BNB Incubation Alliance During Binance Blockchain Week
Alvin Lang Nov 07, 2024 12:17 Multipli, a ZK-based yield protocol, wins... -
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Seeks to Dismiss Three of Crypto Exchange Kraken’s Defenses in U.S. Lawsuit
The SEC sued Kraken in November 2023 for operating a platform as an unregistered securities exchange,...