Moreover, it seems wrong that Bitcoin should not be subject to strong regulatory intervention, up to practically forbidding it. The belief that one is protected from the effective access of law enforcement authorities can be quite deceptive, even for decentralised autonomous organisation (DAO). DAOs are member-owned digital communities, without central leadership, that are based on blockchain technology. A recent case involved BarnBridge DAO, which was fined more than $1.7 million by the SEC for failing to register the offer and sale of crypto securities. Despite claiming autonomy, the DAO settled following SEC pressure on its founders. When administrators of decentralised infrastructures are identified, authorities can effectively prosecute them, highlighting the limitations of claimed autonomy.
Related posts
-
Bitcoin Price Mirrors 2017 Pattern, Is The Top Only 2 Weeks Away After Hitting $100,000?
Este artículo también está disponible en español. The Bitcoin price is well on its way to... -
Namecheap Amasses $73 Million in Bitcoin Revenue With Over 1.1 Million Transactions
Namecheap recorded an astounding 1.1 million bitcoin transactions with over $73 million generated in revenue. Revenue... -
Bitcoin LTHs Start Taking Profits – Metrics Reveal Whales Are Actively Spending
Este artículo también está disponible en español. Bitcoin has reached new all-time highs for four consecutive...