Still, centralization by any entity or protocol creates risks for Ethereum as a “concentrated number of liquidity providers or node operators could act as a single point of failure or become targets for attacks or collude to create an oligopoly that would promote their own interests at the expense of the interests of the community,” the report added.
Related posts
-
Ethereum ETFs Falter With $39M Losses as Bitcoin ETFs Steal the Show
On Monday., Nov. 18, spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) had an impressive showing, attracting $254.82 million... -
Bitcoin (BTC) Mining Economics Improved in the First Half of November: JPMorgan
The hashprice, a measure of mining profitability, “increased 29% since the end of October as the... -
Planning Ahead: Cosmos Health Looks to Add Bitcoin and Ethereum to Its Treasury
Chicago-based Cosmos Health, a publicly traded, vertically integrated global healthcare company, is diving into the crypto...