In the absence of “actual issuers” of the “scam tokens,” the plaintiffs argued that Uniswap facilitated the trades at issue by “providing a marketplace and facilities for bringing together buyers and sellers of securities” for a transaction fee, “hoping that this Court might overlook the fact that the current state of cryptocurrency regulation leaves them without recourse, at least as to the specific claims alleged in this suit.”
Related posts
-
Crypto liquidations rally 78% with ETH leading the charts
Cryptocurrency liquidations have seen a sudden increase over the past day. Ethereum (ETH) is still leading... -
Putin Criticizes U.S. Dollar’s Lack of Gold Backing, Calls for Alternative Payment Systems
Russian President Vladimir Putin criticized the United States for... -
Top cryptocurrencies to watch this week: ETH, DAO, ELON
The cryptocurrency market experienced a predominantly bearish trend last week. Bitcoin (BTC), the leading asset, saw...