Because the scenario outlined in this case is narrow and unusual, it “will have limited applicability in arbitration-related jurisprudence going forward,” said Richard Silberberg, an arbitration lawyer with Dorsey & Whitney and a director of the New York International Arbitration Center. “The unanimous SCOTUS decision that a court, not an arbitrator, must decide whether the parties’ first agreement was superseded by the second was hardly surprising,” he added, because previous rulings had pointed in that direction.
Related posts
-
Julian Assange Reaches Plea Deal With U.S. DoJ
As CoinDesk reported at the time, Assange said that Wikileaks initially refrained from accepting bitcoin to... -
Ether (ETH) Traders Buy $4K Calls In Anticipation of Record High
Ether, which came into existence in 2015, set a record price of over $4,800 since November... -
Ripple CEO Hails Latest Court Ruling ‘a Big Win’ — Calls His Lawsuit Baseless Troll Attempt
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse says the latest court ruling...