Had it been implemented as proposed, the rule would have required the sender of any transaction between unhosted wallets to collect know-your-customer data from the receiver. A similar proposal in the U.S. received backlash due to concerns about whether it would even be possible for some entities, like smart contracts with their own wallets, to comply, as well as whether the data would be safe if any random individual had to store it.
Related posts
-
Bitcoin Miner Terawulf to Deliver 70 MW Data Center Infrastructure for AI Expansion
Terawulf Inc., a bitcoin miner and digital infrastructure provider, has signed agreements to deliver over 70... -
Binance Founder CZ Warns: Receiving Crypto This Way Could Instantly Empty Your Wallet
Crypto owners risk losing everything by accepting assets via... -
Best Wallet Raises $5M in New Crypto Presale, Expert Predicts 10x Potential
The Best Wallet ($BEST) token presale continues to attract...