Vitalik Buterin voices concerns over DAOs approving ETH staking pool operators

Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, has expressed worries regarding decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) exerting a monopoly over the selection of node operators in liquidity staking pools.

In a September 30 blog post, Buterin issues a warning that as staking pools adopt the DAO approach for governance over node operatorsโ€”who are ultimately responsible for the pool’s fundsโ€”it can expose them to potential risks from malicious actors.

โ€œWith the DAO approach, if a single such staking token dominates, that leads to a single, potentially attackable governance gadget controlling a very large portion of all Ethereum validators.โ€

Buterin highlights the liquid staking provider Lido (LDO) as an example with a DAO that validates node operators. However, he emphasizes that relying on just one layer of protection may prove insufficient:

โ€œTo the credit of protocols like Lido, they have implemented safeguards against this, but one layer of defense may not be enough,โ€ he noted.

ETH staked by category chart. Source: Vitalik Buterin

Meanwhile, he explains that Rocket Pool offers the opportunity for anyone to become a node operator by placing an 8 Ether (ETH) deposit, which, at the time of this publication, is equivalent to approximately $13,406.

However, he notes this comes with its risks. “The Rocket Pool approach allows attackers to 51% attack the network, and force users to pay most of the costs,” he stated.

On the other hand, Buterin emphasizes that each one must incorporate a mechanism for determining who can serve as the underlying node operators:

“It can’t be unrestricted, because then attackers would join and amplify their attacks with users’ funds.”

Related: Ethereum is about to get crushed by liquid staking tokens

Buterin highlights that a possible approach to address this issue involves encouraging ecosystem participants to utilize a variety of liquid staking providers.ย 

He clarifies this would decrease the likelihood of any one provider becoming excessively large and posing a systemic risk.

โ€œIn the longer term, however, this is an unstable equilibrium, and there is peril in relying too much on moralistic pressure to solve problems,” he stated.

Magazine:ย Are DAOs overhyped and unworkable? Lessons from the front lines