Giving further credence to XRP Army, Byrne adds that the SEC was targeted by a “huge marketing campaign from Ethereum promoters, and people with large quantities of Ethereum” so that the SEC would “leave it alone in the name of technology.” But there’s yet more nuance. Byrne adds that there are other reasons the SEC could have chosen to prosecute Ripple and not Ethereum, including that Ripple continues to sell XRP on secondary markets. “If you sell tokens in the market on January 1, and you’re not supposed to do that, bang, that’s a violation,” says Byrne. “If you do it again on March 10, bang, that’s another violation.” Because of these repeat offenses, says Byrne, “I think it was easier to pin the tail on Ripple.”
Related posts
-
XRP Price Targets Strong Recovery: Key Indicators and Predictions
Aayush Jindal, a luminary in the world of financial markets, whose expertise spans over 15 illustrious... -
Forget The Dip! XRP Primed For Epic Rally To $36, Expert Claims
The price of XRP, the native token of RippleNet, has been caught in the crosshairs of... -
XRP 6-Year Trendline Draws To A Close, 1,500% Rally Seen
As the major pieces begin to fall into place, XRP may now be in a position...