The introduction of the Libra stablecoin project led to, years later, multiple regulatory approaches and the certainty that sooner or later, governments will have rules in place for how stablecoins can operate. However, all of these efforts have focused on asset-backed stablecoins, not algorithmic stablecoins. The novel structures here might result in new approaches from regulators. The major difference? Libra never launched, and there haven’t been any asset-backed stablecoin collapses the way there was with UST. That difference may lead to regulators placing a higher priority on this issue.
Related posts
-
Australian Court Exempts Block Earner from Paying Penalty; Criticizes Regulator’s Misleading Press Release
A Federal court in Australia has relieved the crypto... -
Ripio CEO: Brazilian Companies Are Paying Chinese Suppliers With Cryptocurrency
Sebastian Serrano, CEO of Ripio, one of the largest... -
Argentine Officials Met With Salvadoran Regulators to Discuss Bitcoin Adoption and Regulation
Argentine officials of the CNV, the country’s equivalent to the U.S. SEC, and Salvadoran officials of...