The lawyers argued that this would “require relief from this Court,” they would be faced with a separate risk of commingling of their treasury investments, and the step “creates a risk of loss in the event of a need for rapid monetization, or the lack of liquidity in the surety collateral market, which is not an idle concern given the recent bank failures allegedly caused in part by overinvestment in U.S. treasuries.”
Related posts
-
Multi-Billion Dollar Compensation Plan Goes To Vote
Ronaldo is an experienced crypto enthusiast dedicated to the nascent and ever-evolving industry. With over five... -
FTX customers to vote on bankruptcy repayment plan
A U.S. judge approved FTX’s plan to poll creditors on its Chapter 11 repayment. FTX users... -
Mt. Gox Effect? Bitcoin’s (BTC) Dominance Rate Registers Biggest Drop in 5 Months
BTC’s dominance, or share of total crypto market value, fell by 1.8% to 54.34%, the biggest...