The introduction of the Libra stablecoin project led to, years later, multiple regulatory approaches and the certainty that sooner or later, governments will have rules in place for how stablecoins can operate. However, all of these efforts have focused on asset-backed stablecoins, not algorithmic stablecoins. The novel structures here might result in new approaches from regulators. The major difference? Libra never launched, and there haven’t been any asset-backed stablecoin collapses the way there was with UST. That difference may lead to regulators placing a higher priority on this issue.
Related posts
-
JPMorgan Chase Paying $100,000,000 To Customers As Bank Settles Wave of Allegations From U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
JPMorgan Chase is handing $100 million to customers after settling a wave of allegations from the... -
Glassnode Report Reveals Insights on Bitcoin’s Latest Rally – Why Investors Are Paying Attention
Bitcoin’s recent price rally to $69,000 marked a notable shift, according to research from Glassnode and... -
Crypto has a leadership problem: What can regulators do?
Crypto cons are frequent, and the sector’s loudest and most well-known leaders have faced substantial legal...