In the absence of “actual issuers” of the “scam tokens,” the plaintiffs argued that Uniswap facilitated the trades at issue by “providing a marketplace and facilities for bringing together buyers and sellers of securities” for a transaction fee, “hoping that this Court might overlook the fact that the current state of cryptocurrency regulation leaves them without recourse, at least as to the specific claims alleged in this suit.”
Related posts
-
Ethereum Whales Bought $1 Billion ETH In The Past 96 Hours – Details
Este artículo también está disponible en español. Ethereum has faced significant volatility over the past few... -
Ethereum’s $15.3B Burn Bonfire: Over 4.5M ETH Destroyed Since EIP-1559 Activation
This weekend, data confirms that more than 4.5 million... -
What Lies Ahead For ETH?
Este artículo también está disponible en español. Due to yesterday’s crypto market rout, Ethereum (ETH) has...