The Khan’s currency united all the stories about money because the Khan wielded all the coercive power. But the reverse is also true: He wielded all the coercive power because he united all the stories about money. Today, when we try to conjure one money to rule them all, we are implicitly seeking to concentrate coercive power in whomever holds that money. Yes, this is a critique of Bitcoin, but don’t fail to notice that it’s also a critique of “universal” basic income. I fervently wish to guarantee everyone a baseline of dignity, but there’s no telling what will be lost, or where power will end up concentrated, if a monetary baseline establishes a universal unit of account whose governance is not seriously accountable. “Local” or “community” basic income seem less dangerous.
Related posts
-
Chainlink Hits $13.5 For The First Time Since July – Smart Money Accumulation?
Este artículo también está disponible en español. Chainlink (LINK) has surged impressively over the past few... -
We’ve Been Thinking About Blockchains Wrong. They’re About Time, Not Money
The good news is it’s not too late. We need to look past the allure of... -
Bitcoin (BTC) Mining Startup Promises Free Money to Renewable Energy Companies
This is where bitcoin mining, Marr realized, can provide a profitable solution. If a solar plant,...