As bad as she was, the Googler was worse. Gaddis, who responds to legal requests the search engine giant receives, spent his ever-so-brief testimony saying there existed metadata that (I guess) demonstrated some Google doc whose contents weren’t actually discussed had been received, or worked on, or something, by Bankman-Fried. (Editor’s note: No, I’m not going to try to improve that sentence because it’s perfect.) Then cross-examination demonstrated Gaddis didn’t know a damn thing about metadata, a revelation that threw the bench into disarray.
Related posts
-
Bitcoin Hits New Low Since February, Options Market Stays Optimistic
According to the latest data, $305.43 million was liquidated across crypto derivatives exchanges when bitcoin dipped... -
Binance US Confident in Legal Battle Against SEC as Case Moves Forward
Binance US responded to the court’s decision to allow... -
The Case for Crypto Index Funds
There are already more than a dozen crypto index funds marketed to investors, ranging from $1...