Moreover, it seems wrong that Bitcoin should not be subject to strong regulatory intervention, up to practically forbidding it. The belief that one is protected from the effective access of law enforcement authorities can be quite deceptive, even for decentralised autonomous organisation (DAO). DAOs are member-owned digital communities, without central leadership, that are based on blockchain technology. A recent case involved BarnBridge DAO, which was fined more than $1.7 million by the SEC for failing to register the offer and sale of crypto securities. Despite claiming autonomy, the DAO settled following SEC pressure on its founders. When administrators of decentralised infrastructures are identified, authorities can effectively prosecute them, highlighting the limitations of claimed autonomy.
Related posts
-
Hellish US Debt Scenario Could Propel Bitcoin to $1 Million by 2030
Sebastian Serrano, CEO of the Argentina-based cryptocurrency exchange Ripio, has predicted that bitcoin will reach $1... -
Eric Trump to Speak at Bitcoin MENA in Abu Dhabi
PRESS RELEASE. Abu Dhabi, UAE – November 5th, 2024 – Bitcoin MENA has announced Eric Trump... -
Bitcoin (BTC) Mining Difficulty Tops 100T for First Time, Piling Pressure on Small Miners
Bitcoin’s hashrate hit a record high on a seven-day moving average of 755 EH/s last week....