To be sure, the dual-banking system itself at present is far from federalism perfected, and state and federal jurisdiction over banks does overlap in important ways; state-chartered banks that are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and/or the Federal Reserve System, for example, face additional federal supervision. But such federal bank supervision makes even less sense for stablecoin issuers, which ultimately provide a payment tool (tokens designed to maintain a 1:1 peg with the U.S. dollar), not banking services.
Related posts
-
Ripple’s Stablecoin Hits Singapore – Regulated Exchange Brings RLUSD to Transform Markets
Ripple’s USD-backed stablecoin, Ripple USD, debuts in Singapore on regulated exchange Independent Reserve, unlocking faster, cost-efficient... -
Stablecoin Frenzy: USDE Nears $6B as USD0 Rockets Past $1B in Market Supply
Over the past month, the stablecoin market has swelled... -
Russian Official Declares BRICS Payment System a Real Alternative to US Dollar
A top Russian official has declared plans for a...