To be sure, the dual-banking system itself at present is far from federalism perfected, and state and federal jurisdiction over banks does overlap in important ways; state-chartered banks that are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and/or the Federal Reserve System, for example, face additional federal supervision. But such federal bank supervision makes even less sense for stablecoin issuers, which ultimately provide a payment tool (tokens designed to maintain a 1:1 peg with the U.S. dollar), not banking services.
Related posts
-
EU’s Restrictive Stablecoin Rules Take Effect on June 30, Issuers Are Running Out of Time
“Tether has engaged extensively with its exchange counterparties in Europe regarding the requirements, including those pertaining... -
The Two-Class System of Regulation Plaguing Europe
In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital finance, the... -
Tether to Stop Minting Stablecoin USDT on Algorand and EOS
The circulating supply of the dollar-linked stablecoin on the two blockchains represents roughly 0.1% of the...