The history of the cryptocurrency project can be traced to the 1970s. One key factor was the fear of future surveillance. Both surveillance and the possibility to more directly manipulate transaction data. I wrote about Paul Armor, a computer scientist who worked on and off in the Department of Defense, and at Rand in the 70s, where they asked him to design a next-gen surveillance system, to keep tabs on the Soviet Union and anticipate their moves. His team came up with an electronic payments system. They realized tracking money flows gives you useful information. It means that you have a time-stamped, geocoded record of every time someone pays for something. You have a really fine-grained dossier of everybody’s movements and activities, and the transaction data itself. So you know where they are, what they’re interested in, what they’re like. A lot of the people who are working on the earliest stages of digital cash were preparing for when most of the economy and commerce goes digital, so everyone would be under surveillance and coercion at a level never really seen before. That’s the context when we see the need for digital currency [bitcoin] appear. Not just to make things more efficient, but to protect people from the incursions of surveillance and power.
Related posts
-
Digital Asset Inflows Reach Record High With US Elections on the Horizon
The year-to-date inflows for digital assets hit a new... -
U.S. Election Winner Is Unlikely to Have Much Influence on Bitcoin’s Post-Result Rally, History Indicates: Van Straten
Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal... -
What’s Next for Political Meme Coins? An In-Depth Look at the Politifi Sector’s Future
The politifi token sector has enjoyed a solid year...