Approaching the DeFi regulation problem by imposing KYC-AML requirements on DeFi protocols is definitely viable but also quite constraining and potentially harmful to the DeFi space. The decentralized, transparent and programmable nature of DeFi provides a foundation for new types of regulatory frameworks. As a general principle, DeFi introduces groundbreaking innovations in the structure of financial primitives, so why shouldn’t we think about regulatory models that leverage those native innovations? Even though some of these ideas might result insufficient from a regulatory coverage standpoint, their underlying principles might help to provide a better bridge between DeFi and current regulatory frameworks.
Related posts
-
2025: Crypto’s Next Boom – 3 Key Predictions (DeFi, Stablecoins, Retail)
No one can argue with 2024 being a breakthrough year for crypto. BTC and ETH ETFs... -
AAVE Dominates DeFi Lending – Metrics Reveal 45% Market Share
Este artículo también está disponible en español. Aave (AAVE), the leading decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocol,... -
ETFs now hold more Bitcoin Than Satoshi, this could be a bullish sign for this new DeFi coin
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page...