Since zk rollups are so computationally intensive, it is nearly impossible to recreate the full EVM environment that layer 1 and Optimistic rollups are able to run. Therefore, this scaling solution is confined to single types of transactions and cannot host a wide variety of projects on a single network. However, since zk rollups compute and verify transactions on their own, the technology is able to offer fast finality and transaction costs that are significantly lower than Optimistic rollups and magnitudes lower than mainnet.
Related posts
-
Ethereum’s $15.3B Burn Bonfire: Over 4.5M ETH Destroyed Since EIP-1559 Activation
This weekend, data confirms that more than 4.5 million... -
Believers Aren’t ‘Delusional’ Enough: Expert
Este artículo también está disponible en español. A known market analyst sees the $6 per coin... -
Ethereum’s $4,000 Struggle: A Modest Gain Amid Bitcoin’s $100K Glory
While bitcoin (BTC) climbed into the $100,000 range, ethereum (ETH) took a modest step upward with...