Since zk rollups are so computationally intensive, it is nearly impossible to recreate the full EVM environment that layer 1 and Optimistic rollups are able to run. Therefore, this scaling solution is confined to single types of transactions and cannot host a wide variety of projects on a single network. However, since zk rollups compute and verify transactions on their own, the technology is able to offer fast finality and transaction costs that are significantly lower than Optimistic rollups and magnitudes lower than mainnet.
Related posts
-
Polkadot Treasury Reserves at All-Time Low And DOT Bears Aren’t Helping
Polkadot is among the top blockchains, securing a spot in the top 20. Even though the... -
Ethereum’s Market Conundrum—ETH Slips Further Behind as Bitcoin Shines
This week, bitcoin (BTC) is enjoying an 8.5% lift against the U.S. dollar, while ethereum (ETH),... -
As Hong Kong Firms Downsize, Animoca Built a Workspace the Size of 10 Tennis Courts
“We went from 7,500 square feet to 28,000 square feet,” said Evan Auyang, president of Animoca...