“Opaque group structures may also render it difficult for clients of service providers to know which entity they are dealing with and its regulatory status,” ESMA said in a statement today, adding that some existing crypto companies “may lack a strong compliance culture … and their large scale and geographic scope allow them to maintain a high level of agility in terms of where they can operate, increasing the risk of conflicts of interest, regulatory arbitrage and an unlevel playing field.”
Related posts
-
AI Agents Can Help Crypto Become the Currency of AI
Imagine a situation where an agent engages another agent to complete a specific task such as... -
After Binance’s Costly Lesson, Do Rival Crypto Exchanges Risk Running Afoul of U.S. Rules?
Bybit, Bitget and OKX, three of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges, all prohibit traders from the U.S.,... -
Crypto Valley (CVEX) DEX to Go Live in January Offering Cheap On-Chain Futures and Options Trading
Futures and options account for a huge amount of trading in traditional markets, but crypto derivatives...