In his ruling, the judge said the phrasing of the various filings raise questions about “what would constitute ‘undue’ focus on attorney involvement,” “what could suggest inappropriately that attorneys had ‘blessed’ a particular course of conduct” and what legal theory would allow evidence that met the first two questions.
Related posts
-
FTX customers to vote on bankruptcy repayment plan
A U.S. judge approved FTX’s plan to poll creditors on its Chapter 11 repayment. FTX users... -
Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange Freed From Prison — Set to Plead Guilty in US Deal
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has been released from prison... -
‘Crypto Winter’ Arrives Early For The Altcoin Market As Venture Capital, Founder Selloffs Mount
Ronaldo is an experienced crypto enthusiast dedicated to the nascent and ever-evolving industry. With over five...