In his ruling, the judge said the phrasing of the various filings raise questions about “what would constitute ‘undue’ focus on attorney involvement,” “what could suggest inappropriately that attorneys had ‘blessed’ a particular course of conduct” and what legal theory would allow evidence that met the first two questions.
Related posts
-
TOKYO BEAST Teams up With Tools for Humanity, a Contributor to World Network Co-Founded by Alex Blania and Sam Altman
PRESS RELEASE. TOKYO BEAST FZCO (Headquarters: Dubai, United Arab... -
BitMEX Founder Predicts Bitcoin Goes To $1 Million Under Trump
Este artículo también está disponible en español. In his latest essay titled “Black or White?”Arthur Hayes,... -
FanDuel founders launch crypto casino, raise $6m in seed funding
BetHog, a new crypto-based casino and sportsbook founded by FanDuel co-founders, has launched with $6 million...