This finding of theft and deceit by Wright is not incidental or a footnote – it, not the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, was part of the actual substance of the case. Dave Kleiman was a seriously disabled man who appears to have struggled greatly in his final years (in fact, establishing this was part of the defense’s strategy as it tried to prove Kleiman was too sick to actively contribute to his work with Wright). Wright had repeatedly described Kleiman as a very close friend and in other warm terms in private communications, and said he regarded Dave’s death as tragic. Yet the jury ultimately agreed with the plaintiff’s claim that Wright stole Kleiman’s work using, in part, a series of falsified and backdated documents.
Related posts
-
Bitcoin Investors Show Fear, Could A Price Bottom Be Imminent?
Semilore Faleti is a cryptocurrency writer specialized in the field of journalism and content creation. While... -
Bitcoin Will Hit New All-Time High If It Breaks This Level
Este artículo también está disponible en español. Bitcoin, which started the month on a negative note,... -
Bitcoin Cash: Empowering Merchants and Boosting Adoption in Bitcoin Cash City
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) has emerged as a popular cryptocurrency, offering fast and low-cost transactions. In the...