To be sure, the dual-banking system itself at present is far from federalism perfected, and state and federal jurisdiction over banks does overlap in important ways; state-chartered banks that are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and/or the Federal Reserve System, for example, face additional federal supervision. But such federal bank supervision makes even less sense for stablecoin issuers, which ultimately provide a payment tool (tokens designed to maintain a 1:1 peg with the U.S. dollar), not banking services.
Related posts
-
Bitcoin’s sanity check for a broken system
If you’ve been watching markets and feel like they’ve lost the plot, you’re not alone. Bitcoin... -
Paypal Seeks to Drive PYUSD Adoption With 3.7% Reward on Users’ Stablecoin Holdings
Paypal is launching a new rewards program for its... -
PayPal to Pay 3.7% Annual Yield on Stablecoin PYUSD to Encourage Broader Use
PayPal is upping the ante in the stablecoin wars as it’s set to begin offering U.S....