Far too often, regulators, policy makers, and commentators have looked at potential stablecoin regulation and assessed the risks relative those presented by the institutions facilitating these traditional forms of payments. I believe that stablecoins do not present more or less risk, but rather different risks. In one sense, the fully-backed nature of stablecoins can help mitigate against systemic risk and make supervision of their holdings far simpler for regulators than traditional banks. On the other hand, stablecoins present unique operational risks based on their underlying technology and use in new forms of payment activity that may not have been previously considered by regulators.
Related posts
-
Matrixport outlines new risks that could challenge Bitcoin’s rally in 2025
Bitcoin’s next bull run could face headwinds from quantum computing advancements and shifting inflation dynamics, analysts... -
Ripple’s Stablecoin Hits Singapore – Regulated Exchange Brings RLUSD to Transform Markets
Ripple’s USD-backed stablecoin, Ripple USD, debuts in Singapore on regulated exchange Independent Reserve, unlocking faster, cost-efficient... -
Stablecoin Frenzy: USDE Nears $6B as USD0 Rockets Past $1B in Market Supply
Over the past month, the stablecoin market has swelled...