In addition to potentially hurting Storm’s defense, Klein’s letter to the court suggested that Judge Failla’s ruling may have contravened one of the federal rules that govern criminal proceedings. Essentially, Klein argued that the government cannot legally compel the defense to disclose the names of its expert witnesses unless the defense has requested the same information from the prosecution. Storm’s defense “intentionally made no such request,” Klein wrote, in order to keep their witness list private.
Related posts
-
VanEck partners with Kiln for SOL staking, analysts predict $800 for Bitcoin Cash and $1 for Intel Markets
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page... -
Peter Todd, Bitcoin Developer Named as Satoshi Nakamoto in HBO Documentary, Goes Into Hiding
“Falsely claiming that ordinary people of ordinary wealth are extraordinarily rich exposes them to threats like... -
A Major Improvement to Bitcoin Cash Will Smash Developer Bottlenecks
Andrei Terentiev, CTO of Bitcoin.com, explains why Bitcoin.com has thrown its full support behind Bitcoin Cash...