In addition to potentially hurting Storm’s defense, Klein’s letter to the court suggested that Judge Failla’s ruling may have contravened one of the federal rules that govern criminal proceedings. Essentially, Klein argued that the government cannot legally compel the defense to disclose the names of its expert witnesses unless the defense has requested the same information from the prosecution. Storm’s defense “intentionally made no such request,” Klein wrote, in order to keep their witness list private.
Related posts
-
Bitcoin Next Big Move? Key Metric Reveals When to Cash In Profits
Meet Samuel Edyme, Nickname – HIM-buktu. A web3 content writer, journalist, and aspiring trader, Edyme is... -
Stanford Blockchain Club Challenges DOJ’s Tornado Cash Case
The Stanford Blockchain Club, a prominent group at Stanford... -
KULR Technology plans to allocate 90% of surplus cash to Bitcoin
KULR Technology Group announced plans to allocate up to 90% of its cash surplus, including $12...