But there are also significant structural and transparency differences in crypto that make an impact. Most of all, a conventional startup with high spending in excess of income, or “burn rate,” will see its equity value drop faster in a higher interest rate environment because “burn” implies future borrowing. But in crypto, the “burn rate” of a blockchain is not collated in a single place – arguably, it is instead spread out among the various maintainers and contributors in a way that’s hard to read. In other words, it’s more difficult to figure out the real financial picture of a blockchain ecosystem, particularly whether it’s somehow reliant on outside financing, than when it comes to equities.
Related posts
-
Blockchain Association Tables 5-Point Crypto Agenda For Trump’s Administration
Crypto advocacy group Blockchain Association has reached out to US President-elect Donald Trump and the newly... -
Bitcoin Funding Rates Surge 20% On Major Exchanges — What’s Happening?
The price of Bitcoin picked up this week from where it left off in the previous... -
NFT Fever Cools: Ethereum and Bitcoin NFT Sales Dive Amid Broader Crypto Growth
Non-fungible token (NFT) sales cooled off this week, slipping 9.3% compared to the prior period, even...